H1-B
Workers - NO GRACE PERIOD AFTER ALL!
There is bad news for H-1B employees who have been
laid off or whose jobs have been terminated. It was
generally believed that because of the economic slow
down and the resultant massive cutbacks in the work
force, the Immigration and Naturalization Service
(INS) would consider granting a grace period to H-1B
workers who had lost their jobs. While no actual rule
to this effect had been passed, the INS had itself
suggested in its June
19th 2001 Memo, that one who previously held H-1B
status should be entitled to possibly up to 60 days
grace period to avail of the benefits of AC21. There
were also rumors about at least a 30 day grace period
should INS deny an H-1B petition or extension of status.
In addition the law provides for a ’10 day
grace period’ in three specific instances:
- an H-1B worker can be admitted 10 days prior to
the start date of his petition;
- an H-1B worker may remain for a period of 10 days
after the expiration of his petition; and
- an H-1B worker, whose extension petition has been
denied, is also given 10 days to depart the U.S.
In any case, it was generally believed that the INS
would view each application on a case-by-case basis
and if the gap between the termination of the previous
employment and the finding of a new job was fairly
brief, the INS would be likely to approve the new
petition and extend the status of the alien.
However the INS has now confirmed that there is to
be no grace period at all to laid-off H-1B workers.
Efren Hernandez III, Director of the Business and
Trade Services Branch, INS, Washington D.C., has announced
in late December 2001, that the INS will not provide
any grace period for maintaining status after employment
termination. Mr. Hernandez believes that this position
taken by the INS is legally justified and explained
that there should be no difference between H-1B workers
and other non-immigrants, like students, who also
cannot justify a stay in the U.S. beyond the express
purpose of their admission.
This being the position taken by the INS, Mr. Hernandez
further confirmed that the individual must be in status
at the time of applying for an extension of stay.
In other words, even brief status lapses are not likely
to be overlooked by the INS unless extraordinary circumstances
existed. Failure to maintain status could result in
the H-1B petition being approved but no I-94 card
being attached to the approval and so no extension
of stay being granted. The alien will have to leave
the country and re-enter after obtaining a visa stamp
from the U.S. Consulate in his foreign country of
residence.
In short, not only will the H-1B employee lose his
job through no fault of his own but he will also be
regarded as out of status by remaining in the country.
Even the 10-day grace period will not apply as, unfortunately,
the three specific instances cited above do not cover
termination of employment prior to the petition validity.
Further, if the H-1 worker is considered to be out
of status, the H-4 dependents will also be regarded
as being out of status.
Not only does this strict interpretation of the law
go against the general purpose of the H-1B program,
which is to allow foreign workers to fill jobs for
which there was both a shortage of US workers and
for which there was a crucial necessity in the U.S.
economy, but it also does not take into account the
benefits that U.S. companies would enjoy by being
allowed to recruit from an existing skilled professional
workforce within the U.S.
|